|
Preface
It is forty years since Humanist Manifesto I (1933)
appeared. Events since then make that earlier statement seem
far too optimistic. Nazism has shown the depths of brutality
of which humanity is capable. Other totalitarian regimes
have suppressed human rights without ending poverty. Science
has sometimes brought evil as well as good. Recent decades
have shown that inhuman wars can be made in the name of
peace. The beginnings of police states, even in democratic
societies, widespread government espionage, and other abuses
of power by military, political, and industrial elites, and
the continuance of unyielding racism, all present a
different and difficult social outlook. In various
societies, the demands of women and minority groups for
equal rights effectively challenge our generation.
As we approach the twenty-first century, however, an
affirmative and hopeful vision is needed. Faith,
commensurate with advancing knowledge, is also necessary. In
the choice between despair and hope, humanists respond in
this Humanist Manifesto II with a positive declaration for
times of uncertainty.
As in 1933, humanists still believe that traditional theism,
especially faith in the prayer-hearing God, assumed to live
and care for persons, to hear and understand their prayers,
and to be able to do something about them, is an unproved
and outmoded faith. Salvationism, based on mere affirmation,
still appears as harmful, diverting people with false hopes
of heaven hereafter. Reasonable minds look to other means
for survival.
Those who sign Humanist Manifesto II disclaim that they are
setting forth a binding credo; their individual views would
be stated in widely varying ways. This statement is,
however, reaching for vision in a time that needs direction.
It is social analysis in an effort at consensus. New
statements should be developed to supersede this, but for
today it is our conviction that humanism offers an
alternative that can serve present-day needs and guide
humankind toward the future.
-
Paul Kurtz and Edwin H. Wilson (1973)
The next century can be and should be the humanistic
century. Dramatic scientific, technological, and
ever-accelerating social and political changes crowd our
awareness. We have virtually conquered the planet, explored
the moon, overcome the natural limits of travel and
communication; we stand at the dawn of a new age, ready to
move farther into space and perhaps inhabit other planets.
Using technology wisely, we can control our environment,
conquer poverty, markedly reduce disease, extend our
life-span, significantly modify our behavior, alter the
course of human evolution and cultural development, unlock
vast new powers, and provide humankind with unparalleled
opportunity for achieving an abundant and meaningful life.
The future is, however, filled with dangers. In learning to
apply the scientific method to nature and human life, we
have opened the door to ecological damage, over-population,
dehumanizing institutions, totalitarian repression, and
nuclear and bio-chemical disaster. Faced with apocalyptic
prophesies and doomsday scenarios, many flee in despair from
reason and embrace irrational cults and theologies of
withdrawal and retreat.
Traditional moral codes and newer irrational cults both fail
to meet the pressing needs of today and tomorrow. False
"theologies of hope" and messianic ideologies, substituting
new dogmas for old, cannot cope with existing world
realities. They separate rather than unite peoples.
Humanity, to survive, requires bold and daring measures. We
need to extend the uses of scientific method, not renounce
them, to fuse reason with compassion in order to build
constructive social and moral values. Confronted by many
possible futures, we must decide which to pursue. The
ultimate goal should be the fulfillment of the potential for
growth in each human personality - not for the favored few,
but for all of humankind. Only a shared world and global
measures will suffice.
A humanist outlook will tap the creativity of each human
being and provide the vision and courage for us to work
together. This outlook emphasizes the role human beings can
play in their own spheres of action. The decades ahead call
for dedicated, clear-minded men and women able to marshal
the will, intelligence, and cooperative skills for shaping a
desirable future. Humanism can provide the purpose and
inspiration that so many seek; it can give personal meaning
and significance to human life.
Many kinds of humanism exist in the contemporary world. The
varieties and emphases of naturalistic humanism include
"scientific," "ethical," "democratic," "religious," and
"Marxist" humanism. Free thought, atheism, agnosticism,
skepticism, deism, rationalism, ethical culture, and liberal
religion all claim to be heir to the humanist tradition.
Humanism traces its roots from ancient China, classical
Greece and Rome, through the Renaissance and the
Enlightenment, to the scientific revolution of the modern
world. But views that merely reject theism are not
equivalent to humanism. They lack commitment to the positive
belief in the possibilities of human progress and to the
values central to it. Many within religious groups,
believing in the future of humanism, now claim humanist
credentials. Humanism is an ethical process through which we
all can move, above and beyond the divisive particulars,
heroic personalities, dogmatic creeds, and ritual customs of
past religions or their mere negation.
We affirm a set of common principles that can serve as a
basis for united action - positive principles relevant to
the present human condition. They are a design for a secular
society on a planetary scale.
For these reasons, we submit this new Humanist Manifesto for
the future of humankind; for us, it is a vision of hope, a
direction for satisfying survival.
Religion
FIRST
We believe, however, that traditional dogmatic or
authoritarian religions that place revelation, God, ritual,
or creed above human needs and experience do a disservice to
the human species. Any account of nature should pass the
tests of scientific evidence; in our judgment, the dogmas
and myths of traditional religions do not do so. Even at
this late date in human history, certain elementary facts
based upon the critical use of scientific reason have to be
restated. We find insufficient evidence for belief in the
existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or
irrelevant to the question of survival and fulfillment of
the human race. As nontheists, we begin with humans not God,
nature not deity. Nature may indeed be broader and deeper
than we now know; any new discoveries, however, will but
enlarge our knowledge of the natural.
Some humanists believe we should reinterpret traditional
religions and reinvest them with meanings appropriate to the
current situation. Such redefinitions, however, often
perpetuate old dependencies and escapisms; they easily
become obscurantist, impeding the free use of the intellect.
We need, instead, radically new human purposes and goals.
We appreciate the need to preserve the best ethical
teachings in the religious traditions of humankind, many of
which we share in common. But we reject those features of
traditional religious morality that deny humans a full
appreciation of their own potentialities and
responsibilities. Traditional religions often offer solace
to humans, but, as often, they inhibit humans from helping
themselves or experiencing their full potentialities. Such
institutions, creeds, and rituals often impede the will to
serve others. Too often traditional faiths encourage
dependence rather than independence, obedience rather than
affirmation, fear rather than courage. More recently they
have generated concerned social action, with many signs of
relevance appearing in the wake of the "God Is Dead"
theologies. But we can discover no divine purpose or
providence for the human species. While there is much that
we do not know, humans are responsible for what we are or
will become. No deity will save us; we must save ourselves.
SECOND: Promises of immortal salvation or fear of
eternal damnation are both illusory and harmful. They
distract humans from present concerns, from
self-actualization, and from rectifying social injustices.
Modern science discredits such historic concepts as the
"ghost in the machine" and the "separable soul." Rather,
science affirms that the human species is an emergence from
natural evolutionary forces. As far as we know, the total
personality is a function of the biological organism
transacting in a social and cultural context. There is no
credible evidence that life survives the death of the body.
We continue to exist in our progeny and in the way that our
lives have influenced others in our culture.
Traditional religions are surely not the only obstacles to
human progress. Other ideologies also impede human advance.
Some forms of political doctrine, for instance, function
religiously, reflecting the worst features of orthodoxy and
authoritarianism, especially when they sacrifice individuals
on the altar of Utopian promises. Purely economic and
political viewpoints, whether capitalist or communist, often
function as religious and ideological dogma. Although humans
undoubtedly need economic and political goals, they also
need creative values by which to live.
Ethics
THIRD
FOURTH: Reason and intelligence are the most effective
instruments that humankind possesses. There is no
substitute: neither faith nor passion suffices in itself.
The controlled use of scientific methods, which have
transformed the natural and social sciences since the
Renaissance, must be extended further in the solution of
human problems. But reason must be tempered by humility,
since no group has a monopoly of wisdom or virtue. Nor is
there any guarantee that all problems can be solved or all
questions answered. Yet critical intelligence, infused by a
sense of human caring, is the best method that humanity has
for resolving problems. Reason should be balanced with
compassion and empathy and the whole person fulfilled. Thus,
we are not advocating the use of scientific intelligence
independent of or in opposition to emotion, for we believe
in the cultivation of feeling and love. As science pushes
back the boundary of the known, humankind's sense of wonder
is continually renewed, and art, poetry, and music find
their places, along with religion and ethics.
The
Individual
FIFTH
SIXTH: In the area of sexuality, we believe that
intolerant attitudes, often cultivated by orthodox religions
and puritanical cultures, unduly repress sexual conduct. The
right to birth control, abortion, and divorce should be
recognized. While we do not approve of exploitive,
denigrating forms of sexual expression, neither do we wish
to prohibit, by law or social sanction, sexual behavior
between consenting adults. The many varieties of sexual
exploration should not in themselves be considered "evil."
Without countenancing mindless permissiveness or unbridled
promiscuity, a civilized society should be a tolerant one.
Short of harming others or compelling them to do likewise,
individuals should be permitted to express their sexual
proclivities and pursue their lifestyles as they desire. We
wish to cultivate the development of a responsible attitude
toward sexuality, in which humans are not exploited as
sexual objects, and in which intimacy, sensitivity, respect,
and honesty in interpersonal relations are encouraged. Moral
education for children and adults is an important way of
developing awareness and sexual maturity.
Democratic Society
SEVENTH
EIGHTH: We are committed to an open and democratic
society. We must extend participatory democracy in its true
sense to the economy, the school, the family, the workplace,
and voluntary associations. Decision-making must be
decentralized to include widespread involvement of people at
all levels - social, political, and economic. All persons
should have a voice in developing the values and goals that
determine their lives. Institutions should be responsive to
expressed desires and needs. The conditions of work,
education, devotion, and play should be humanized.
Alienating forces should be modified or eradicated and
bureaucratic structures should be held to a minimum. People
are more important than decalogues, rules, proscriptions, or
regulations.
NINTH: The separation of church and state and the
separation of ideology and state are imperatives. The state
should encourage maximum freedom for different moral,
political, religious, and social values in society. It
should not favor any particular religious bodies through the
use of public monies, nor espouse a single ideology and
function thereby as an instrument of propaganda or
oppression, particularly against dissenters.
TENTH: Humane societies should evaluate economic systems
not by rhetoric or ideology, but by whether or not they
increase economic well-being for all individuals and groups,
minimize poverty and hardship, increase the sum of human
satisfaction, and enhance the quality of life. Hence the
door is open to alternative economic systems. We need to
democratize the economy and judge it by its responsiveness
to human needs, testing results in terms of the common good.
ELEVENTH: The principle of moral equality must be
furthered through elimination of all discrimination based
upon race, religion, sex, age, or national origin. This
means equality of opportunity and recognition of talent and
merit. Individuals should be encouraged to contribute to
their own betterment. If unable, then society should provide
means to satisfy their basic economic, health, and cultural
needs, including, wherever resources make possible, a
minimum guaranteed annual income. We are concerned for the
welfare of the aged, the infirm, the disadvantaged, and also
for the outcasts - the mentally retarded, abandoned, or
abused children, the handicapped, prisoners, and addicts -
for all who are neglected or ignored by society. Practicing
humanists should make it their vocation to humanize personal
relations.
We
believe in the right to universal education. Everyone has a
right to the cultural opportunity to fulfill his or her
unique capacities and talents. The schools should foster
satisfying and productive living. They should be open at all
levels to any and all; the achievement of excellence should
be encouraged. Innovative and experimental forms of
education are to be welcomed. The energy and idealism of the
young deserve to be appreciated and channeled to
constructive purposes.
We
deplore racial, religious, ethnic, or class antagonisms.
Although we believe in cultural diversity and encourage
racial and ethnic pride, we reject separations which promote
alienation and set people and groups against each other; we
envision an integrated community where people have a maximum
opportunity for free and voluntary association.
We
are critical of sexism or sexual chauvinism - male or
female. We believe in equal rights for both women and men to
fulfill their unique careers and potentialities as they see
fit, free of invidious discrimination.
World Community
TWELFTH
THIRTEENTH: This world community must renounce the
resort to violence and force as a method of solving
international disputes. We believe in the peaceful
adjudication of differences by international courts and by
the development of the arts of negotiation and compromise.
War is obsolete. So is the use of nuclear, biological, and
chemical weapons. It is a planetary imperative to reduce the
level of military expenditures and turn these savings to
peaceful and people-oriented uses.
FOURTEENTH: The world community must engage in
cooperative planning concerning the use of rapidly depleting
resources. The planet earth must be considered a single
ecosystem. Ecological damage, resource depletion, and
excessive population growth must be checked by international
concord. The cultivation and conservation of nature is a
moral value; we should perceive ourselves as integral to the
sources of our being in nature. We must free our world from
needless pollution and waste, responsibly guarding and
creating wealth, both natural and human. Exploitation of
natural resources, uncurbed by social conscience, must end.
FIFTEENTH: The problems of economic growth and
development can no longer be resolved by one nation alone;
they are worldwide in scope. It is the moral obligation of
the developed nations to provide - through an international
authority that safeguards human rights - massive technical,
agricultural, medical, and economic assistance, including
birth control techniques, to the developing portions of the
globe. World poverty must cease. Hence extreme
disproportions in wealth, income, and economic growth should
be reduced on a worldwide basis.
SIXTEENTH: Technology is a vital key to human progress
and development. We deplore any neo-romantic efforts to
condemn indiscriminately all technology and science or to
counsel retreat from its further extension and use for the
good of humankind. We would resist any moves to censor basic
scientific research on moral, political, or social grounds.
Technology must, however, be carefully judged by the
consequences of its use; harmful and destructive changes
should be avoided. We are particularly disturbed when
technology and bureaucracy control, manipulate, or modify
human beings without their consent. Technological
feasibility does not imply social or cultural desirability.
SEVENTEENTH: We must expand communication and
transportation across frontiers. Travel restrictions must
cease. The world must be open to diverse political,
ideological, and moral viewpoints and evolve a worldwide
system of television and radio for information and
education. We thus call for full international cooperation
in culture, science, the arts, and technology across
ideological borders. We must learn to live openly together
or we shall perish together.
Humanity As a Whole
IN CLOSING
We,
the undersigned, while not necessarily endorsing every
detail of the above, pledge our general support to Humanist
Manifesto II for the future of humankind. These affirmations
are not a final credo or dogma but an expression of a living
and growing faith. We invite others in all lands to join us
in further developing and working for these goals.
Lionel Able, Prof. of English, State Univ. of New York at
Buffalo
Khoren Arisian, Board of Leaders, NY Soc. for Ethical
Culture
Isaac Asimov, author
George Axtelle, Prof. Emeritus, Southern Illinois Univ.
Archie J. Bahm, Prof. of Philosophy Emeritus, Univ. of N.M.
Pual
H. Beattie, Pres., Fellowship of Religious Humanists
Keith Beggs, Exec. Dir., American Humanist Association
Malcolm Bissell, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Southern
California
H.
J. Blackham, Chm., Social Morality Council, Great Britain
Brand Blanshard, Prof. Emeritus, Yale University
Paul
Blanshard, author
Joseph L. Blau, Prof. of Religion, Columbia University
Sir
Hermann Bondi, Prof. of Math., King's Coll., Univ. of London
Howard Box, Leader, Brooklyn Society for Ethical Culture
Raymond B. Bragg, Minister Emer., Unitarian Ch., Kansas City
Theodore Brameld, Visiting Prof., C.U.N.Y.
Brigid Brophy, author, Great Britain
Lester R. Brown, Senior Fellow, Overseas Development Council
Betty Chambers, Pres., American Humanist Association
John
Ciardi, poet
Francis Crick, M.D., Great Britain
Arthur Danto, Prof. of Philosophy, Columbia University
Lucien de Coninck, Prof., University of Gand, Belgium
Miriam Allen deFord, author
Edd
Doerr, Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Peter Draper, M.D., Guy's Hospital Medical School, London
Paul
Edwards, Prof. of Philosophy, Brooklyn College
Albert Ellis, Exec. Dir., Inst. Adv. Study Rational
Psychotherapy
Edward L. Ericson, Board of Leaders, NY Soc. of Ethical
Culture
H.
J. Eysenck, Prof. of Psychology, Univ. of London
Roy
P. Fairfield, Coordinator, Union Graduate School
Herbert Feigl, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Minnesota
Raymond Firth, Prof. Emeritus of Anthropology, Univ. of
London
Antony Flew, Prof. of Philosophy, The Univ., Reading,
England
Kenneth Furness, Exec. Secy., British Humanist Association
Erwin Gaede, Minister, Unitarian Church, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Richard S. Gilbert, Minister, First Unitarian Ch.,
Rochester, N.Y.
Charles Wesley Grady, Minister, Unit. Univ. Ch., Arlington,
Ma.
Maxine Greene, Prof., Teachers College, Columbia University
Thomas C. Greening, Editor, Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Alan
F. Guttmacher, Pres., Planned Parenthood Fed. of America
J.
Harold Hadley, Min., Unit. Univ. Ch., Pt. Washington, N.Y.
Hector Hawton, Editor, Questions, Great Britain
Eustace Haydon, Prof. Emeritus of History of Religions
James Hemming, Psychologist, Great Britain
Palmer A. Hilty, Adm. Secy., Fellowship of Religious
Humanists
Hudson Hoagland, Pres. Emeritus, Worcester Fdn. for Exper.
Bio
Robert S. Hoagland, Editor, Religious Humanism
Sidney Hook, Prof. Emeritus of Philosophy, New York
University
James F. Hornback, Leader, Ethical Society of St Louis
James M Hutchinson, Minister Emer., First Unit. Ch.,
Cincinnati
Mordecai M. Kaplan, Rabbi, Fndr. of Jewish Reconstr.
Movement
John
C. Kidneigh, Prof. of Social Work., Univ. of Minnesota
Lester A. Kirdendall, Prof. Emeritus, Oregon State Univ.
Margaret Knight, Univ. of Aberdeen, Scotland
Jean
Kotkin, Exec. Secy., American Ethical Union
Richard Kostelanetz, poet
Paul
Kurtz, Editor, The Humanist
Lawrence Lader, Chm., Natl. Assn. for Repeal of Abortion
Laws
Edward Lamb, Pres., Lamb Communications, Inc.
Corliss Lamont, Chm., Natl. Emergency Civil Liberties Comm.
Chauncey D. Leake, Prof., Univ. of California, San Francisco
Alfred McC. Lee, Prof. Emeritus, Soc.-Anthropology, C.U.N.Y.
Elizabeth Briant Lee, author
Christopher Macy, Dir., Rationalist Press Assn., Great
Britain
Clorinda Margolis, Jefferson Comm. Mental Health Cen.,
Phila.
Joseph Margolis, Prof. of Philosophy, Temple Univ.
Harold P. Marley, Ret. Unitarian Minister
Floyd W. Matson, Prof. of American Studies, Univ. of Hawaii
Lester Mondale, former Pres., Fellowship of Religious
Humanists
Lloyd Morain, Pres., Illinois Gas Company
Mary
Morain, Editorial Bd., Intl. Soc. of General Semantics
Charles Morris, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Florida
Henry Morgentaler, M.D., Past Pres., Humanist Assn. of
Canada
Mary
Mothersill, Prof. of Philosophy, Bernard College
Jerome Nathanson, Chm. Bd. of Leaders, NY Soc. Ethical
Culture
Billy Joe Nichols, Minister, Richardson Unitarian Church,
Texas
Kai
Nielsen, Prof. of Philosophy, Univ. of Calgary, Canada
P.
H. Nowell-Smith, Prof. of Philosophy, York Univ., Canada
Chaim Perelman, Prof. of Philosophy, Univ. of Brussels,
Belgium
James W. Prescott, Natl, Inst. of Child Health and Human
Dev.
Harold J. Quigley, Leader, Ethical Humanist Society of
Chicago
Howard Radest, Prof. of Philosophy, Ramapo College
John
Herman Randall, Jr., Prof. Emeritus, Columbia Univ.
Oliver L. Reiser, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Pittsburgh
Robert G. Risk, Pres., Leadville Corp.
Lord
Ritchie-Calder, formerly Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland
B.
T. Rocca, Jr., Consultant, Intl. Trade and Commodities
Andre H. Sakharov, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, U.S.S.R.
Sidney H. Scheuer, Chm., Natl, Comm. for an Effective
Congress
Herbert W. Schneider, Prof. Emeritus, Claremont Grad. School
Clinton Lee Scott, Universalist Minister, St Petersburgh,
Fla.
Roy
Wood Sellars, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Michigan
A.
B. Shah, Pres., Indian Secular Society
B.
F. Skinner, Prof. of Psychology, Harvard Univ.
Kenneth J. Smith, Leader, Philadelphia Ethical Society
Matthew Ies Spetter, Chm., Dept. Ethics, Ethical Culture
Schools
Mark
Starr, Chm., Esperanto Info. Center
Svetozar Stojanovic, Prof. Philosophy, Univ. Belgrade,
Yugoslavia
Harold Taylor, Project Director, World University Student
Project
V.
T. Thayer, author
Herbert A. Tonne, Ed. Board, Journal of Business Education
Jack
Tourin, Pres., American Ethical Union
E.
C. Vanderlaan, lecturer
J.
P. van Praag, Chm., Intl. Humanist and Ethical Union,
Utrecht
Maurice B. Visscher, M.D., Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of
Minnesota
Goodwin Watson, Assn. Coordinator, Union Graduate School
Gerald Wendt, author
Henry N. Wieman, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Chicago
Sherwin Wine, Rabbi, Soc. for Humanistic Judaism
Edwin H. Wilson, Ex. Dir. Emeritus, American Humanist Assn.
Bertram D. Wolfe, Hoover Institution
Alexander S. Yesenin-Volpin, mathematician
Marvin Zimmerman, Prof. of Philosophy, State Univ. NY at
Bflo.
Additional Signers
Gina
Allen, author
John
C. Anderson, Humanist Counselor
Peter O. Anderson, Assistant Professor, Ohio State
University
William F. Anderson, Humanist Counselor
John
Anton, Professor, Emory University
Sir
Alfred Ayer, Professor, Oxford, Great Britain
Celia Baker
Ernest Baker, Associate Professor, University of the Pacific
Marjorie S. Baker, Ph.D.,Pres., Humanist Community of San
Francisco
Henry S. Basayne, Assoc. Exec. Off., Assn. for Humanistic
Psych.
Walter Behrendt, Vice Pres., European Parliament, W. Germany
Robert O. Boothe, Prof. Emer., Cal. Polytechnic
W.
Bonness, Pres. Bund Freirelgioser Gemeinden, Germany
Clement A. Bosch
Madeline L. Bosch
Bruni Boyd, Vice Pres., American Ethical Union
J.
Lloyd Brereton, ed., Humanist in Canada
Nancy Brewer, Humanist Counselor
D.
Bronder, Bund Freirelgioser Gemeinden, West Germany
Charles Brownfield, Asst. Prof., Queensborough Community
College, CUNY
Costantia Brownfield, R. N.
Margaret Brown, Assoc. Prof., Oneonta State Univ. College
Beulah L. Bullard, Humanist Counselor
Joseph Chuman, Leader, Ethical Soc. of Essex Co.
Gordon Clanton, Asst. Prof., Trenton State College
Daniel S. Collins, Leader, Unitarian Fellowship of
Jonesboro, Ark.
Wm
Creque, Pres., Fellowship of Humanity, Oakland, Ca.
M.
Benjamin Dell, Dir., Amer. Humanist Assn.
James Durant IV, Prof., Polk Comm. College Winter Haven,
Fla.
Gerald A. Ehrenreich, Assoc. Prof., Univ. of Kansas School
of Medicine
Marie Erdmann, Teacher, Campbell Elementary School
Robert L. Erdmann, Ph.D., IBM
Hans
S. Falck, Disting. Professor, Menninger Foundation
James Farmer, Director, Public Policy Training Institute
Ed
Farrar
Joe
Felmet, Humanist Counselor
Thomas Ferrick, Leader, Ethical Society of Boston
Norman Fleishman, Exec. Vice Pres., Planned Parenthood World
Population, Los Angeles
Joseph Fletcher, Visiting Prof., Sch. of Medicine, Univ. of
Virginia
Douglas Frazier, Leader, American Ethical Union
Betty Friedan, Founder, N.O.W.
Harry M. Geduld, Professor, Indiana University
Roland Gibson, President, Art Foundation of Potsdam. N.Y.
Aron
S. Gilmartin, Minister, Mt. Diablo Unitarian Church, Walnut
Creek, Ca.
Anabelle Glasser, Director, American Ethical Union
Rebecca Goldblum, Director, American Ethical Union
Louis R. Gomberg, Humanist Counselor
Harold N. Gordon, Vice President, American Ethical Union
Sol
Gordon, Professor, Syracuse University
Theresa Gould, American Ethical Union
Gregory O. Grant, Captain, USAF
Ronald Green, Asst. Professor, New York University
LeRue Grim, Secretary, American Humanist Association
S.
Spencer Grin, Publisher, Saturday Review/World
Josephine R. Gurbarg, Secy., Humanist Society of Greater
Philadelphia
Samuel J. Garbarg
Lewis M. Gubrud, Executive Director, Mediators Fellowship,
Providence, R.I.
Frank A. Hall, Minister, Murray Univ. Church, Attleboro,
Mass.
Harold Hansen, President, Space Coast Chapter, AHA
Abul
Hasanat, Secretary, Bangladesh Humanist Society
Ethelbert Haskins, Director, American Humanist Association
Lester H. Hayes, Public Relations Director, American Income
Life Insurance Company
Donald E. Henshaw, Humanist Counselor
Alex
Hershaft, Principal Scientist, Booz Allen Applied Research
Ronald E. Hestand, author and columnist
Irving Louis Horowitz, editor, Society
Warren S. Hoskins, Humanist Counselor
Mark
W. Huber, Director, American Ethical Union
Harold J. Hutchinson, Humanist Counselor
Sir
Julian Huxley, former head, UNESCO, Great Britain
Arthur M. Jackson, Exec. Dir., Humanist Community of San
Jose; Treasurer, American Humanist Association
Linda R. Jackson, Director, American Humanist Association
Steven Jacobs, former President, American Ethical Union
Thomas B. Johnson, Jr., consulting psychologist
Robert Edward Jones, Exec. Dir., Joint Washington Office for
Social Concern
Marion Kahn, Pres., Humanist Society of Metropolitan New
York
Alec
E. Kelley, Professor, University of Arizona
Marvin Kohl, Professor, SUNY at Fredonia
Frederick C. Kramer, Humanist Counselor
Eugene Kreves, Minister, DuPage Unit. Church, Naperville,
Ill.
Pierre Lamarque, France
Helen B. Lamb, economist
Jerome D. Lang, Pres., Humanist Assoc. of Greater Miami,
Fla.
Harvey Lebrun, Chairman, Chapter Assembly, AHA
Helen Leibson, President, Philadelphia Ethical Society
John
F. MacEnulty, Jr., Pres., Humanist Soc. of Jacksonville,
Fla.
James T. McCollum, Humanist Counselor
Vashti McCollum, former President of AHA
Russell L. McKnight, Pres., Humanist Association of Los
Angeles
Ludlow P. Mahan, Jr., Pres., Humanist Chapter of Rhode
Island
Andrew Malleson, M.D., psychiatrist
Clem
Martin, M.D.
James R. Martin, Humanist Counselor
Stanley E. Mayabb, Co-Fndr.; Humanist Group of Vacaville and
Men's Colony, San Louis Obispo
Zhores Medvedev, scientist, U.S.S.R.
Abeldardo Mena, M.D., senior psychiatrist, V.A. Hospital,
Miami, Fla.
Jacques Monod, Institut Pasteur, France
Herbert J. Muller, Professor, University of Indiana
Robert J. Myler, Title Officer, Title Insurance & Trust
Company
Gunnar Myrdal, Professor, University of Stockholm, Sweden
H.
Kyle Nagel, Minister, Unit. Univ. Church of Kinston, N.C.
Dorothy N. Naiman, Professor Emerita, Lehman College, CUNY
Muriel Neufeld, Executive Committee, American Ethical Union
Walter B. Neumann, Treasurer, American Ethical Union
G.
D. Parikh, Indian Radical Humanist Association, India
Eleanor Wright Pelrine, author, Canada
Bernard Porter, President, Toronto Humanist Association
William Earl Proctor, Jr., President, Philadelphia area, AHA
Gonzalo Quiogue, Vice Pres., Humanist Assn. of the
Philippines
James A. Rafferty, Lecturer, USIU School of Human Behavior
Anthony F. Rand, President, Humanist Society of Greater
Detroit
Philip Randolph, President, A. Philip Randolph Institute
Ruth
Dickinson Reams, President, Humanist Association National
Capital Area
Jean-Francois Revel, journalist, France
Bernard L. Riback, Humanist Counselor
B.
T. Rocca, Sr., President, United Secularists of America
M.
L. Rosenthal, Professor, New York University
Jack
C. Rubenstein, Executive Committee, AEU
Joseph R. Sanders, Professor, University of West Florida
William Schulz, Ph.D. cand., Meadville/Lombard, Univ. of
Chicago
Walter G. Schwartz, Dir., Humanist Com. of San Francisco
John
W. Sears, clinical psychologist
Naomi Shaw, Pres., National Women's Conference, AEU
R.
L. Shuford, III, Instructor, Charlotte County Day School
Sidney Siller, Chm. Comm. for Fair Divorce and Alimony Laws
Joell Silverman, Chm., Religious Education Committee, AEU
Warren A. Smith, Pres., Variety Sound Corp.
A.
Solomon, coordinator, Indian Secular Society
Robert Stone
Robert M. Stein, Co-Chairman, Public Affairs Committee, AEU
Stuart Stein, Director, American Ethical Union
Arnold E Sylvester
Emerson Symonds, Director, Sensory Awareness Center
Carolyn Symonds, marriage counselor
Ward
Tabler, Visiting Professor, Starr King School
Barbara M. Tabler
V.
M. Tarkunde, Pres., All Indian Radical Humanist Assn., India
Erwin Theobold, Instructor, Pasadena City College
Ernest N. Ukpaby, Dean, University of Nigeria
Renate Vambery, Ethical Soc. of St. Louis, President, AHA St
Louis Chapter
Nick
D. Vasileff, St. Louis Ethical Society
Robert J. Wellman, Humanist Chaplain, C. W. Post Center,
Long Island University
May
H. Weis, UN Representative for IHEU
Paul
D. Weston, Leader, Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County
Georgia H. Wilson, retired, Political Sc. Dept., Brooklyn
College
H.
Van Rensselaer Wilson, Prof., Emer., Brooklyn College
James E. Woodrow, Exec. Dir., Asgard Enterprises, Inc.
Copyright © 1973 by the American Humanist Association
Permission to
reproduce this material, complete and unmodified, in
electronic or printout form is hereby granted free of charge
by the copyright holder to nonprofit humanist and
freethought publications. All other uses, and uses by all
others, requires that requests for permission be made
through the American Humanist Association, at
www.americanhumanist.org.
|